Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd

Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd

Jesse Russell Ronald Cohn

     

бумажная книга



ISBN: 978-5-5105-8394-6

High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee and the Liverpool Post and Echo Ltd UKHL 44 was a 2004 decision by the House of Lords on the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on freedom of expression. The Act, particularly Section 12, cautioned the courts to only grant remedies that would restrict publication before trial where it is "likely" that the trial will establish that the publication would not be allowed. Banerjee, an accountant with Cream Holdings, obtained documents which she claimed contained evidence of illegal and unsound practices on Cream`s part and gave them to the Liverpool Daily Post Echo, who ran a series of articles on 13 and 14 June 2002 asserting that a director of Cream had been bribing a local council official in Liverpool. Cream applied for an emergency injunction on 18 June in the High Court of Justice, where Lloyd J decided on 5 July that Cream had shown "a real prospect of success" at trial, granting the injunction. This judgment was confirmed by the Court of Appeal on 13 February 2003.